xbolva00 added a comment. In D130894#3715124 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D130894#3715124>, @mstorsjo wrote:
> This broke building with GCC (also noted by buildbot mails): > > ../tools/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp: In member function ‘void > clang::Sema::DiagnoseStaticAssertDetails(const clang::Expr*)’: > ../tools/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp:16666:19: error: declaration of > ‘const clang::Expr* clang::Sema::DiagnoseStaticAssertDetails(const > clang::Expr*)::<unnamed struct>::Expr’ changes meaning of ‘Expr’ > [-fpermissive] > 16666 | const Expr *Expr; > | ^~~~ > In file included from ../tools/clang/include/clang/AST/DeclCXX.h:22, > from ../tools/clang/include/clang/AST/ASTLambda.h:18, > from ../tools/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp:15: > ../tools/clang/include/clang/AST/Expr.h:109:7: note: ‘Expr’ declared here > as ‘class clang::Expr’ > 109 | class Expr : public ValueStmt { > | ^~~~ It is kinda bad that GCC throws an error and Clang does not even print a warning. How is it even possible? Clang does not implement strict(er) rules ? @aaron.ballman Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D130894/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D130894 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits