doru1004 added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/test/OpenMP/target_data_use_device_addr_codegen_ptr.cpp:14
+ {
+ #pragma omp target data use_device_addr(x)
+ {
----------------
ye-luo wrote:
> doru1004 wrote:
> > ye-luo wrote:
> > > In my understanding of the spec.
> > > `map(tofrom:x[0:256])` only maps the memory segment that x points to. x
> > > itself as a pointer scalar is not mapped.
> > > use_device_addr(x) should fail to find the map of x scalar.
> > > 5.2 spec.
> > > If the list item is not a mapped list item, it is assumed to be
> > > accessible on the target device.
> > > To me, it seems just keep &x as it was, in this case &x remains a host
> > > address.
> > >
> > > But in your patch description, it seems treating x differently from a
> > > scalar.
> > >
> > > I also applied your patch on main and got segfault because the x has a
> > > value of device address and x[0] fails. This should be the behavior of
> > > use_device_ptr instead of use_device_addr.
> > > To me, it seems just keep &x as it was, in this case &x remains a host
> > > address.
> >
> > So does this mean that if I do something like this in the target data I
> > should get different addresses for x:
> >
> >
> > ```
> > #pragma omp target data use_device_ptr(x)
> > {
> > fprintf(stderr, "x: %p\n", __LINE__, x);
> > }
> >
> > #pragma omp target data use_device_addr(x)
> > {
> > fprintf(stderr, "x: %p\n", __LINE__, x);
> > }
> > ```
> >
> >
> > > I also applied your patch on main and got segfault because the x has a
> > > value of device address and x[0] fails.
> >
> > That's my fault x[0] was the wrong thing to use actually.
> >
> >
> When you have an outer `target data map(x)`, then two printf differ. If there
> is no outer `map(x)`, two printf should be identical.
> When you have an outer `target data map(x)`, then two printf differ. If there
> is no outer `map(x)`, two printf should be identical.
This is super helpful thank you! I'll make sure that happens.
In the case when an outer target data exists, the print of the x which is under
use_device_addr should print the same address as printing x on the host?
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D133694/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D133694
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
