tbaeder added a comment.

In D134020#3795091 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D134020#3795091>, @erichkeane 
wrote:

> I can't come up with a way to get a reference to one of these, so the logic 
> in the rest of the DeclRefExpr handling is a little MORE awkward looking now. 
>  I think I'm OK with this, but I want to give a few other folks a chance to 
> look.

Ah right, I could to through that code path as well and not immediately return. 
I actually tested references but the AST expresses that through a 
`MaterializeTemporaryExpr`, which don't work yet.

In D134020#3795092 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D134020#3795092>, @erichkeane 
wrote:

> Also note, the CI test is from your test!

Yup, that needs one of the other open patches.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D134020/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D134020

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to