luismarques added a comment. Regarding the overkill of "RISCVInstrInfoZawrs.td", how about having a "RISCVInstrInfoExtra.td" (or "RISCVInstrInfoExt.td") as a grab bag for everything that doesn't merit its own .td file?
I think this is fine regarding the versioning issue. Seems to only be missing the actual instruction tests, otherwise LGTM. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D133443/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D133443 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
