mizvekov added a comment. In D133683#3818752 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D133683#3818752>, @ychen wrote:
> I didn't add that because this patch is logically part of D128745 > <https://reviews.llvm.org/D128745> which has a release note already. Okay, I see that the existing release note entry talks just about implementing those DRs without going specific, so that is fine. It does not mention that DR1432 implementation is tentative as there is no published resolution though. > I think GCC is the one that is not conforming. MSVC agrees it is ambiguous > (https://godbolt.org/z/T5zbxaTYq). Basically, only the first parameter is > considered for partial ordering. > (https://eel.is/c++draft/temp.deduct.partial#3.1) I could totally buy that the GCC behavior is accidental, but it does make sense, with the idea behind DR1432, that we should prefer the first overload because that deduction is simpler, or because it does not deduce a parameter pack. If there was a resolution, the answer here would be clear cut, but since there isn't, we are making up our own rules and getting into a language design discussion. If you don't think that is clear cut, it's fine, we can move this discussion elsewhere :) Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D133683/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D133683 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
