royjacobson added a comment. In D134885#3827383 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D134885#3827383>, @erichkeane wrote:
> In D134885#3826335 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D134885#3826335>, @royjacobson > wrote: > >> Apparently some of the workers crashed with the test - >> https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/216/builds/10556, but I couldn't >> reproduce this locally. @shafik any idea why the diagnostics might change? :/ > > I have no idea where that warning comes from. That shouldn't happen on ANY > machine, since it is a public member (a is), not a private one (which should > cause the diagnostic). Is that the only bot with this problem? > > I don't know what the 'sie' build is... but it gets me wondering if that > diagnostic is getting an uninitialized version of "VerifyOnly" somewhere? It > seems to me that it should be suppressing that diagnostic (if that is what > VerifyOnly means here?)? > > It IS bizarre to me that this crash would be noticed by something that DIDN'T > try to evaluate that diagnostic though, since the ICE is on that code path. Hmmm, uninitialized access might explain why it's runner dependent. I'll try and see if I can run it through USan. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D134885/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D134885 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
