Thanks for the quick review! I’ve updated the patch with the name changes in the attached diff file.
From: David Majnemer [mailto:david.majne...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, July 25, 2016 12:40 PM To: Keane, Erich <erich.ke...@intel.com> Cc: cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org Subject: Re: [ReviewRequest] [Sema/Parser] GCC Compatibility Patch: Support for __final specifier I'd rename VS_Alt_Final to VS_GNU_Final. On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 2:24 PM, Keane, Erich via cfe-commits <cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org<mailto:cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: Hi all, my first potential-contribution, so I apologize if I’m submitting this improperly, I’m unfamiliar with the ‘type’ keys that you use in the topic, so hopefully I have this right. As reported in bug 28473, GCC supports ‘final’ functionality in pre-C++11 code using the __final keyword. Clang currently supports the ‘final’ keyword in accordance with the C++11 specification, however it ALSO supports it in pre-C++11 mode, with a warning. This patch adds the ‘__final’ keyword for compatibility with GCC in GCC Keywords mode (so it is enabled with existing flags), and issues a warning on its usage (suggesting switching to the C++11 keyword). This patch also adds a regression test for the functionality described. I believe this patch has minimal impact, as it simply adds a new keyword for existing behavior. This has been validated with check-clang to avoid regressions. Patch is created in reference to revisions 276665 Thanks, Erich _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org<mailto:cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
__final_clang.diff
Description: __final_clang.diff
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
