ChuanqiXu added a comment. In D137059#3896661 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D137059#3896661>, @dblaikie wrote:
> Could you link to the email/discourse discussion about supporting this mode > (I think you've linked it in other discussions, be good to have it for > reference here & Probably in the other review)? (I'm wondering if we need a > new flag for this, or if it'll be OK to change the driver behavior to always > coalesce the .cppm->.pcm->.o path into a single step, for instance - I > realize this is a somewhat breaking change but may be acceptable given that > modules aren't widely deployed yet) Done. From my reading, in that discourse discussing, we're not talking about to add the new flags. I add the flag since I don't want the `.pcm` file pollutes the user space accidentally. > if it'll be OK to change the driver behavior to always coalesce the > .cppm->.pcm->.o path into a single step I am not sure what you mean. Do you talk about to forbidden the original 2-phase compilation model? If so, I think it is definitely the wrong direction. The 2-phase compilation model should be the correct direction in the long term since it has higher parallelism. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D137059/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D137059 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
