schittir added a comment. In D139148#3965404 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D139148#3965404>, @shafik wrote:
> This looks like the correct thing to do but I see further down there are also > unconditional uses of `Initializer` that should also be guarded with a check. > It would be good to fix those as well since we are here. Yes, it does make sense. > I am guessing the answer is no since this was found using a static analysis > tool but do you have a test case that triggers this failure? Indeed, the answer is no. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D139148/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D139148 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
