amyk added a comment.

Hi,

The ppc64le-flang-rhel-clang <https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/21> bot 
is also experiencing some failures with the `Driver/fast_math.f90` test case. 
In particular, `crtfastmath.o` is not found at all for `CHECK-CRT` as we can 
see in the failure details 
<https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/21/builds/57841/steps/6/logs/FAIL__Flang__fast_math_f90>.

  llvm-project/flang/test/Driver/fast_math.f90:64:19: error: CHECK-CRT-SAME: 
expected string not found in input
  ! CHECK-CRT-SAME: crtfastmath.o

The output for the `CHECK-CRT` line on the bot looks like the following:

  
"/home/buildbots/ppc64le-flang-rhel-test/ppc64le-flang-rhel-clang-build/build/bin/flang-new"
 "-fc1" "-triple" "powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu" "-emit-obj" 
"-mrelocation-model" "pic" "-pic-level" "2" "-pic-is-pie" "-ffast-math" 
"-target-cpu" "ppc64le" "-o" "/tmp/lit-tmp-x_okwzug/fast_math-e9ab49.o" "-x" 
"f95-cpp-input" 
"/home/buildbots/ppc64le-flang-rhel-test/ppc64le-flang-rhel-clang-build/llvm-project/flang/test/Driver/fast_math.f90"
 
  
  "/usr/bin/ld" "-pie" "--hash-style=gnu" "--eh-frame-hdr" "-m" "elf64lppc" 
"-dynamic-linker" "/lib64/ld64.so.2" "-o" 
"/home/buildbots/ppc64le-flang-rhel-test/ppc64le-flang-rhel-clang-build/build/tools/flang/test/Driver/Output/fast_math.f90.tmp"
 "/usr/lib/gcc/ppc64le-redhat-linux/8/../../../../lib64/Scrt1.o" 
"/usr/lib/gcc/ppc64le-redhat-linux/8/../../../../lib64/crti.o" 
"/usr/lib/gcc/ppc64le-redhat-linux/8/crtbeginS.o" 
"-L/usr/lib/gcc/ppc64le-redhat-linux/8" 
"-L/usr/lib/gcc/ppc64le-redhat-linux/8/../../../../lib64" "-L/lib/../lib64" 
"-L/usr/lib/../lib64" "-L/lib" "-L/usr/lib" 
"/tmp/lit-tmp-x_okwzug/fast_math-e9ab49.o" "-lFortran_main" "-lFortranRuntime" 
"-lFortranDecimal" "-lm" "-lgcc" "--as-needed" "-lgcc_s" "--no-as-needed" "-lc" 
"-lgcc" "--as-needed" "-lgcc_s" "--no-as-needed" 
"/usr/lib/gcc/ppc64le-redhat-linux/8/crtendS.o" 
"/usr/lib/gcc/ppc64le-redhat-linux/8/../../../../lib64/crtn.o"                  
                                                                      

Would it be possible to follow up with a fix for this test case?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D138675/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D138675

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to