JonChesterfield added a comment. Calling convention is the right model here. Kernels are functions with a different calling convention to the 'normal' functions in a very literal sense. The calling convention modelling in clang is different to attribute handling and changing nvptx to it is probably invasive, though it seems to me it could be done incrementally.
I wouldn't suggest adding a nvptx_kernel calling convention to clang though, rather we could repurpose the amdgpu one to be gpu_kernel. Possibly spelled nvptx_kernel for the user but represented within clang as gpu_kernel. Related, I think there's a spirv or opencl kernel representation in llvm for amdgpu, I would be interested in collapsing those and the openmp or hip annotation to a single thing if possible. That's all medium term cleanup ideas, current patch looks good to me. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D140226/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D140226 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
