carlosgalvezp added a comment. Since we are at it - are we happy with the name "ImplementationFileExtensions"? I think "SourceFileExtensions" is more common in the literature, and it would look more visually pleasing in the config file since it has the same length as "HeaderFileExtensions".
HeaderFileExtensions: ["h", "hh"] ImplementationFileExtensions: ["c", "cc"] vs HeaderFileExtensions: ["h", "hh"] SourceFileExtensions: ["c", "cc"] Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D141000/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D141000 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
