dblaikie added a comment. In D141381#4043985 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D141381#4043985>, @fdeazeve wrote:
> In D141381#4040639 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D141381#4040639>, @probinson > wrote: > >> To get data about the code size impact, people typically build some large >> codebase with/without their patch and compare the .text sizes. It's common >> to use clang itself for this experiment. > > I ran a couple of experiments (*), running `objdump --section-headers > build/bin/clang | grep text`: > > Debug without patch: 178,707,948 bytes > Debug with patch: 178,785,896 bytes (+0.04%) That does sound rather promising... I'm guessing if we're going to add this generically for -O0 it's probably worth a thread on discourse for broader visibility. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D141381/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D141381 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
