thegameg added a comment. In D135488#4049050 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D135488#4049050>, @nickdesaulniers wrote:
> In D135488#4049035 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D135488#4049035>, @paulkirth > wrote: > >> Actually if we add >> >> if (!isFunctionInPrintList(MF.getName())) >> return false; >> >> we can filter by name I would rather have a more generic mechanism for remarks or diagnostics in general. Even if it uses `isFunctionInPrintList`, I'd rather have a real flag that doesn't require `-mllvm`. > Does name mangling complicate that? Perhaps a C++ user would give an > unmangled name, but MF would be looking at mangled names? Agreed. A regex would help a little there. > Anyways, it's not a pressing issue. I won't block this patch on that. I just > redirect all the output to a file then scan that. You can easily process the yaml output from `-fsave-optimization-record` with the `optrecord` module: import optrecord import re all_remarks, file_remarks, _ = optrecord.gather_results(optrecord.find_opt_files(<INPUT_FILE>), 1, False) for r in optrecord.itervalues(all_remarks): if re.match(<REGEX>, r.Function): print(r) Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D135488/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D135488 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
