vsk accepted this revision. vsk added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Thanks for catching this! I couldn't really reduce your test case any further. This LGTM. I guess it never makes sense to have two regions with the exact same start/end loc, and different counters. Do you think we should add assertions in llvm (either in llvm-cov, or in the coverage reader) which guard against this? https://reviews.llvm.org/D23160 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
