jhuber6 added a comment. In D141861#4060028 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D141861#4060028>, @srj wrote:
> This change appears to have broken the build when crosscompiling to x86-32 on > a Linux x86-64 system; on the Halide buildbots, we now fail at link time with > > FAILED: bin/nvptx-arch > : && /usr/bin/g++-7 -m32 -Wno-psabi -fPIC -fno-semantic-interposition > -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -Werror=date-time -Wall -Wextra > -Wno-unused-parameter -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual > -Wno-missing-field-initializers -pedantic -Wno-long-long > -Wimplicit-fallthrough -Wno-maybe-uninitialized -Wno-noexcept-type > -Wdelete-non-virtual-dtor -Wno-comment -Wno-misleading-indentation > -fdiagnostics-color -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -fno-common > -Woverloaded-virtual -fno-strict-aliasing -O3 -DNDEBUG > -Wl,-rpath-link,/home/halidenightly/build_bot/worker/llvm-16-x86-32-linux/llvm-build/./lib > -Wl,--gc-sections > tools/clang/tools/nvptx-arch/CMakeFiles/nvptx-arch.dir/NVPTXArch.cpp.o -o > bin/nvptx-arch -Wl,-rpath,"\$ORIGIN/../lib" lib/libLLVMSupport.a -lpthread > -lrt -ldl -lpthread -lm lib/libLLVMDemangle.a && : > /usr/bin/ld: > tools/clang/tools/nvptx-arch/CMakeFiles/nvptx-arch.dir/NVPTXArch.cpp.o: in > function `handleError(cudaError_enum)': > NVPTXArch.cpp:(.text._ZL11handleError14cudaError_enum+0x2b): undefined > reference to `cuGetErrorString' > /usr/bin/ld: > tools/clang/tools/nvptx-arch/CMakeFiles/nvptx-arch.dir/NVPTXArch.cpp.o: in > function `main': > NVPTXArch.cpp:(.text.startup.main+0xcf): undefined reference to `cuInit' > /usr/bin/ld: NVPTXArch.cpp:(.text.startup.main+0xf9): undefined reference > to `cuDeviceGetCount' > /usr/bin/ld: NVPTXArch.cpp:(.text.startup.main+0x11e): undefined reference > to `cuDeviceGet' > /usr/bin/ld: NVPTXArch.cpp:(.text.startup.main+0x131): undefined reference > to `cuDeviceGetAttribute' > /usr/bin/ld: NVPTXArch.cpp:(.text.startup.main+0x146): undefined reference > to `cuDeviceGetAttribute' > collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status I'm guessing here it's finding the `cuda.h` header but not the libraries? Maybe we should determine this via the CMake and add a definition instead of `has_include`. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D141861/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D141861 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
