eddyz87 added a comment.
Slightly above my edit there is a similar logic for NVPTX target:
static void RenderSSPOptions(const Driver &D, const ToolChain &TC,
const ArgList &Args, ArgStringList &CmdArgs,
bool KernelOrKext) {
const llvm::Triple &EffectiveTriple = TC.getEffectiveTriple();
// NVPTX doesn't support stack protectors; from the compiler's perspective,
it
// doesn't even have a stack!
if (EffectiveTriple.isNVPTX())
return;
...
I don't like it because it produces rather vague error message:
warning: argument unused during compilation: '-fstack-protector'
[-Wunused-command-line-argument]
However I'm hesitant to merge the NVPTX check with BPF check to avoid any
potential changes in the NVPTX target behavior (e.g. different warning).
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D142046/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D142046
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
