hjl.tools added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D22045#506996, @joerg wrote:
> For what it is worth, this certainly seems to be misnamed. By nature, if it > doesn't preserve at least the stack pointer, there is no way to recover on > return, right? This is the best name we came up with and has been implemented in GCC. https://reviews.llvm.org/D22045 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
