aaron.ballman added a comment. In D133574#4085681 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D133574#4085681>, @aaron.ballman wrote:
> In D133574#4085472 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D133574#4085472>, @aaron.ballman > wrote: > >> In D133574#4085372 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D133574#4085372>, >> @aaron.ballman wrote: >> >>> So by my understanding, my original changes removing the extension warning >>> (in D40267 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D40267>) were jumping the gun because >>> the committee never made the change we said we'd make. So I believe this is >>> still an extension as far as C conformance is concerned. That said, I'll >>> check with the convener to see if he'd be too frustrated if I filed a CD2 >>> comment asking for `member-designator` to be replaced with `subobject` >>> based on prior discussion, so maayyyybbeee we can fix this for C2x still. >> >> I heard back and there's even more confusion -- we were tracking an older >> copy of the DR list, and there's an update that clarifies this: >> https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2396.htm#dr_496. So you're >> right, the array and member access extension warnings need to be removed. >> I'll take care of that and get it cherry picked into the Clang 16 branch. > > I posted https://reviews.llvm.org/D142723 to address this. and 63d6b8be6cf2422228a1a8800d85a11be469c6e2 <https://reviews.llvm.org/rG63d6b8be6cf2422228a1a8800d85a11be469c6e2> should hopefully resolve it. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D133574/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D133574 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
