nikic added a comment.

You also shouldn't need to introduce any new handling for the fwrapv option. 
I'm not sure how exactly it is currently threaded through, but there must be 
existing handling for it already. For example, there is 
isSignedOverflowDefined() on LangOptions.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D142872/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D142872

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to