TIFitis marked 2 inline comments as done.
TIFitis added inline comments.
================
Comment at:
mlir/lib/Target/LLVMIR/Dialect/OpenMP/OpenMPToLLVMIRTranslation.cpp:1342-1382
+/// Create a constant string location from the MLIR Location information.
+static llvm::Constant *
+createSourceLocStrFromLocation(Location loc, llvm::OpenMPIRBuilder &builder,
+ StringRef name, uint32_t &strLen) {
+ if (auto fileLoc = loc.dyn_cast<FileLineColLoc>()) {
+ StringRef fileName = fileLoc.getFilename();
+ unsigned lineNo = fileLoc.getLine();
----------------
clementval wrote:
> TIFitis wrote:
> > clementval wrote:
> > > TIFitis wrote:
> > > > clementval wrote:
> > > > > TIFitis wrote:
> > > > > > clementval wrote:
> > > > > > > kiranchandramohan wrote:
> > > > > > > > clementval wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Instead of copy pasting this from
> > > > > > > > > `mlir/lib/Target/LLVMIR/Dialect/OpenACC/OpenACCToLLVMIRTranslation.cpp`
> > > > > > > > > can you extract it and put it in a common shared file so
> > > > > > > > > bith translation can use the same code without duplication?
> > > > > > > > @raghavendhra put up a patch some time back and he faced some
> > > > > > > > issues. It might be good to check with him or may be he can
> > > > > > > > comment here.
> > > > > > > > https://reviews.llvm.org/D127037
> > > > > > > > https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-for-refactoring-common-code-for-openacc-and-openmp/63833
> > > > > > > Just moving the three functions should be trivial. I'm not
> > > > > > > talking about the processMapOperand.
> > > > > > I've moved `getSizeInBytes`.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The other two functions make use of `mlir::Location` and thus can't
> > > > > > be moved trivially.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I can still try to move them by individually passing the elements
> > > > > > of `mlir::Location` but that might not be ideal. Is that what you'd
> > > > > > like?
> > > > > What about a new header file in
> > > > > `mlir/include/mlir/Target/LLVMIR/Dialect/**` shared by
> > > > > `mlir/lib/Target/LLVMIR/Dialect/OpenACC/OpenACCToLLVMIRTranslation.cpp`
> > > > > and
> > > > > `mlir/lib/Target/LLVMIR/Dialect/OpenMP/OpenMPToLLVMIRTranslation.cpp`.
> > > > > That should be doable.
> > > > `mlir/lib/Target/LLVMIR/Dialect/OpenACC/OpenACCToLLVMIRTranslation.cpp`
> > > > and
> > > > `mlir/lib/Target/LLVMIR/Dialect/OpenMP/OpenMPToLLVMIRTranslation.cpp`
> > > > already have access to the common `mlir::Location` type.
> > > >
> > > > Problem is that `OMPIRBuilder.cpp` is the only common file between them
> > > > where I can move the two functions to. Currently there are no
> > > > `mlir/**` include files in `OMPIRBuilder.cpp` and it seems to me like a
> > > > strict design choice to have it that way.
> > > The functions can be header only. Why do you need to put them in the
> > > OMPIRBuilder.cpp? I think it is better than duplicate the exact same code
> > > over.
> > Sorry, I misunderstood you earlier.
> > I've added a new header file
> > `mlir/include/mlir/Target/LLVMIR/Dialect/Utils.h`, this is my first attempt
> > at adding a new header file, please let me know if you find any issues.
> Thanks! That's what I had in mind. We might want to check with MLIR folks if
> `mlir::utils` is suited for that. I don't mind if it is `mlir::omp::builder`
> or smth similar since it is related to the OMPIRBuilder.
Since the utils file is common to all the dialects I kept it as `mlir::utils`.
How do I get the opinion from people working in MLIR on this, can you suggest
some reviewers whom I can add?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D142914/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D142914
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
