sammccall added a comment. I can't understand from the description, code, or testcases what problem this is fixing. Can you clarify, ideally by improving the testcases?
It seems to introduce a false negative in the case that the preamble *does* contain a definition of an already-defined macro, which probably needs to be called out. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D143093/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D143093 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
