rupprecht added a comment.

In D124351#4102679 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D124351#4102679>, @aaron.ballman 
wrote:

> In D124351#4102634 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D124351#4102634>, @eaeltsin 
> wrote:
>
>>> Looks like we fail to enter the appropriate context somewhere (my guess is 
>>> that it might be specific to the attribute but it's hard to say without 
>>> picking around), definitely a bug
>>>
>>> I'll be away the next 2 weeks, I'll look at it when I get back. Maybe we 
>>> should track it in an issue though.
>>
>> Should we revert this then?
>
> Yes, I think we should. We should also file an issue so @cor3ntin doesn't 
> lose track of the issue. Anyone want to volunteer to do that? (I can do it 
> early next week otherwise.)

Done in 74ce297045bac4bc475b8e762d2a1ea19bb16d3c 
<https://reviews.llvm.org/rG74ce297045bac4bc475b8e762d2a1ea19bb16d3c> and filed 
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/60518 to track re-landing this.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D124351/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D124351

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to