ccotter added a comment. Realistically, I'm not sure if this change is all that valuable aside from abiding by the CppCoreGuidelines from the readability and consistency standpoint. The only impact this change would have that I can think of is allowing an object with an `&&` (or other combination) qualified `operator()` that would be picked up by this change, which doesn't seem likely of a use case for this function. I'll try to add a small test that covers this and leave it to the maintainers whether this is a worthy change :)
Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D143877/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D143877 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
