hoy added a comment. In D83906#4182287 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D83906#4182287>, @dexonsmith wrote:
> In C++, you get linkonce_odr all over the place. It's basically all functions > that are defined in C++ headers that are available for inlining. > On the other hand, the frontend knows the token sequence from the source > language. It knows whether function B is inherently nounwind based on its ODR > token sequence; in which case, it's safe to use the attribute for an IPA > peephole. Thanks for the detailed explanation again! As you pointed out previously, linkonce_odr is something the front end can optimize. I'm wondering why the front end is confident about that the linker would not replace the current definition with something else. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D83906/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D83906 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
