mnadeem added a comment. In D142420#4184825 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D142420#4184825>, @tblah wrote:
> In D142420#4080619 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D142420#4080619>, @mnadeem wrote: > >> We have tried full LTO on Aarch64 (without this patch) and have seen a few >> 3-8% improvements in SPEC and a 100+% improvement in leslie3d. >> There were a couple of additional failures in SPEC that we have yet to >> inspect but AFAICT no issue with respect to bitcode/assembly changes. > > Hi @mnadeem, thanks for this patch. I'm having some trouble reproducing the > improvement on leslie3d. Can you share more information about your > configuration? Which flags did you use? `-O3 -flto -mllvm -fdynamic-heap-array` on an Aarch64 device. It was tested back in January, so if the improvement is not showing up right now then it may be possible that some other patch/optimization enabled better codegen in non-lto too. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D142420/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D142420 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
