rymiel added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/lib/Format/Format.cpp:809
Style.AllowShortCaseLabelsOnASingleLine);
+ IO.mapOptional("AllowShortCompoundRequirementOnASingleLine",
+ Style.AllowShortCompoundRequirementOnASingleLine);
----------------
Backl1ght wrote:
> MyDeveloperDay wrote:
> > haven't we use "Requires" in other options? What is the definition of
> > Compound?
> >
> > I might be tempted for this to be AllShortRequiresOnASingleLine but then it
> > be an enum with the following options
> >
> > ```
> > Leave
> > Never
> > Always
> > Compound
> > ```
> There are some options related to requires like IndentRequiresClause,
> RequiresClausePosition, etc. But as for single line and brace wrapping,
> requires is not yet considered.
>
> "Compound" is from Compound Requirements section in this page
> https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/requires
>
> I think this is a better way, I would try implementing it.
A //compound-requirement// is what the standard calls it, so I think the name
is fine.
I'm not sure if collating it with other options as suggested is a good idea,
since a //requires-expression// can contain multiple //compound-requirement//s,
such as:
```
requires {
{ E1 } -> C;
{ E2 } -> D<A1>;
};
```
This //requires-expression// has two //compound-requirement//s, and two
formatting of those two individually is what's being controlled by the option.
Although I will agree it should probably still be an enum, but in that case, it
probably shouldn't start with "Allow"
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D139834/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D139834
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
