aaron.ballman added a comment. In D146595#4225132 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D146595#4225132>, @aprantl wrote:
> In D146595#4225048 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D146595#4225048>, @dblaikie > wrote: > >> I know this is a bit of a redirection/scope creep/etc - but I'd quite like >> to see a solution that is likely to be usable for the "std::function" >> problem (stepping into std::function should allow you to reach the >> underlying function - but lldb currently skips any call to a std-namespaced >> function, I think, so you step right over the whole op() call) that could >> also cover the Swift needs. Though perhaps they're just sufficiently >> different problems that there is no generalizing here. > > This patch aims at exposing an existing LLVM IR & DWARF feature in clang. > Having a generic solution for the std::function problem is definitely > worthwhile investigating, but I'm not sure it needs to prevent supporting the > existing mechanism in clang. Why should this feature be limited to DWARF? Don't we have the same kind of stepping behavior issue with PDB files, for example? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D146595/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D146595 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
