tbaeder added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/lib/AST/Interp/PrimType.h:108
+ switch (Expr) {
\
+ TYPE_SWITCH_CASE(PT_Sint8, B)
\
+ TYPE_SWITCH_CASE(PT_Uint8, B)
\
----------------
aaron.ballman wrote:
> Oh boy, this is going to be interesting, isn't it?
> ```
> consteval _Complex _BitInt(12) UhOh() { return (_Complex _BitInt(12))1; }
> consteval _Complex _BitInt(18) Why() { return (_Complex _BitInt(18))1; }
>
> static_assert(UhOh() + Why() == 2);
> ```
>
`_BitInt` isn't supported in the new interpreter at all right now, so this just
gets rejected.
Apart from that... is a complex bitint really something that should be
supported? Not just in the new interpreter but generally?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D146408/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D146408
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
