rymiel added a comment.

> didn't go via the normal clang-format reviewers

Is there a reason for this? This isn't the only case either, for example:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D143070 https://reviews.llvm.org/D144170 
https://reviews.llvm.org/D88299 https://reviews.llvm.org/D135356

I don't have a lot of experience here, so maybe I'm missing "historical" 
context, but this confuses me a lot...


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D147176/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D147176

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to