rsandifo-arm added a comment.

In D147661#4249004 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D147661#4249004>, @erichkeane 
wrote:

> This test doesn't show a change in behavior.

Yeah.  Is there a way to force the syntax and spelling fields to be dumped, 
even for implicit attributes?  I was struggling to find one, which is why I 
wasn't sure this made a difference in practice.

The patch is supposed to be a minor clean-up, since similar calls in 
surrounding code uses `AL` rather than `AL.getRange()`.  The reason I 
originally hit this was that the series I'm working on removes the:

  AttributeCommonInfo(SourceRange)
  AttributeCommonInfo(SourceLocation)

constructors (but keeps the ability to use `FooAttr::CreateImplicit` without 
more than a source range).  It might be easier to explain why that seemed a 
good idea alongside the patches themselves.

The two main uses of these constructors outside tablegen-generated code were 
the two in this patch and the one in https://reviews.llvm.org/D147657.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D147661/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D147661

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to