erichkeane added a comment. In D147714#4251752 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D147714#4251752>, @xbolva00 wrote:
> So to make some conclusion - there is a need for less strict version of > musttail in LLVM, right? Ideally platform specific, like x86_musttail? I'm not sure what the rules for the LLVM definition of musttail should be, but from the CFE's perspective, something like `[[nonportable_musttail]]` that always enforced the rules of the CURRENT platform(note: or stricter, and relaxing would be allowed later) would be acceptable. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D147714/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D147714 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
