Unique_Usman added a comment. In D148601#4279334 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D148601#4279334>, @tbaeder wrote:
> I am not 100% sure about the semantics of passing multiple prefixes, i.e. if > the error is emitted for all prefixes individually or if it's only emitted if > no `expected` line for any of the prefixes is found. In the latter case we > should probably add all the prefixes to the error message. I tested different scenerios e.g added more than one RUN lines with different value of -verify, what I concluded on is that if we have multiple RUN lines with each of them having no directive, the prefixes generated is always of the first occurence with no expected directive so, the error is always generated for the first occurence with no expected directive. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D148601/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D148601 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
