MaskRay added a comment.

In D148573#4280335 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D148573#4280335>, @peter.smith 
wrote:

> With moving the signature before the function entry this looks good to me. 
> I'm not so familiar with the code in https://reviews.llvm.org/D148665 would 
> ideally find someone a bit more experienced to take a look at that part. If 
> I'm the only one available I can take a look but may take a bit more time.
>
> We're looking to clarify when a BTI is required in the ABI 
> https://github.com/ARM-software/abi-aa/issues/196 starting with some design 
> options.

Thank you!

For folks curious about `-fsanitize=function`, I added some paragraphs to 
https://maskray.me/blog/2022-12-18-control-flow-integrity#fsanitizefunction


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D148573/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D148573

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to