steakhal accepted this revision.
steakhal added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.

In D148355#4294798 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D148355#4294798>, @steakhal wrote:

> In D148355#4294738 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D148355#4294738>, @donat.nagy 
> wrote:
>
>> @steakhal I marked a few comments as Done (I accidentally missed some when I 
>> was creating the most recent patch) and now the only not-Done thing is the 
>> followup commit for refactoring the optionalness of RegionRawOffsetV2. Do 
>> you see anything else to do?
>
> I think it's good. I've just scheduled the measurement now for 180+ OSS 
> projects. Stay tuned!

The results are all good. The effect is pretty much equal to the effect of our 
implementation except for a handful of absent reports - and we are talking 
about at most 20 issues in total.
I must say, the report diff looks much better than I anticipated.
Thank you for working on this. Feel free to merge this change whenever you 
want. Thanks.

BTW the issues themselves look terrible. One cannot understand and track the 
value of the index and the assumed buffer size etc.
So the checker will still remain in alpha.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D148355/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D148355

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to