TIFitis marked 2 inline comments as done.
TIFitis added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/CGOpenMPRuntime.cpp:6848
+  class MapCombinedInfoTy : public llvm::OpenMPIRBuilder::MapCombinedInfoTy {
+  public:
     MapExprsArrayTy Exprs;
----------------
jdoerfert wrote:
> Not sure why you made it a class with public, but I guess it doesn't matter.
> Do we really want to use the same name though? I would add "Base" or sth to 
> the llvm class.
The clang code, and eventually the OMPIRBuilder code accesses the members 
directly so they need to be public.

I have kept it the same name in similar fashion to the TargetDataInfo type that 
also got migrated. From OMPBuilder's perspective the type is sufficient and 
when using it from MLIR I don't think we would need the extra data structures 
that clang uses.

Let me know what you think, I can change it to a different name as you 
suggested.


================
Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/CGOpenMPRuntime.cpp:6872
       NonContigInfo.Strides.append(CurInfo.NonContigInfo.Strides.begin(),
                                     CurInfo.NonContigInfo.Strides.end());
     }
----------------
jdoerfert wrote:
> We should use the base append function, no?
The base append function is missing append for the members we introduced here 
like `Exprs` and `Mappers`.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D149666/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D149666

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to