alexshap added a comment. Thanks for the comments. @bcraig, multi-TU support is in - in the sense that it's in at the same level, as it's in for clang-rename and the other tools (take a look my comments above, please). Also: @omtcyf0:
> Well, multi-TU support is needed for many tools and it is far beyond one tool > implementation details if we want it to be >nice. I want to have multi-TU > support in the clang-refactor, but it is still in designing stage at the > moment. At first, one >translation unit might be okay, though. Regarding the tests - yes, i used the other tools as an example. Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D23279 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
