tbaeder added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang/test/AST/Interp/records.cpp:317-318
     {
-      auto T = Test(Arr, Pos);
+      Test(Arr, Pos);
       // End of scope, should destroy Test.
     }
----------------
aaron.ballman wrote:
> Nit: nothing actually tests that this object is destroyed correctly. Here's 
> an interesting test to consider:
> ```
> struct S {
>   constexpr S() {}
>   constexpr ~S() noexcept(false) { throw 12; }
> };
> 
> constexpr int f() {
>   S{};
>   return 12;
> }
> 
> static_assert(f() == 12);
> ```
> That should fail because `~S()` would hit the `throw` expression and thus is 
> not valid. Note, you'll need to add `-Wno-invalid-constexpr` to your test to 
> avoid the warning-defaults-to-error about the destructor never producing a 
> constant expression.
There are multiple reasons why that sample is not rejected right now, one I can 
easily fix in a follow-up patch, the other one would actually require us to 
recognize the `throw` and reject it with a proper diagnostic.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D147591/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D147591

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to