dblaikie accepted this revision. dblaikie added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
In D149193#4328553 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D149193#4328553>, @MaskRay wrote: > In D149193#4328452 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D149193#4328452>, @dblaikie > wrote: > >>> I agree that for most(all?) split DWARF users will not see any difference >>> since they always use -c -o and don't combine compilation and linking in >>> one command. >> >> Given that, I'm not sure that this is worth implementing, but if it suits >> you I guess. > > The split DWARF users are about production users. > > There are command line users who do `clang -g -gsplit-dwarf a.c b.c -o x` and > I have heard about questions that the `.dwo` files go to strange directories > (usually `/tmp`) quite a few times. > Fixing `-gsplit-dwarf` helps set a baseline for other options like > `-ftime-trace` (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/57285). Fair enough Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D149193/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D149193 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
