kzhuravl added inline comments.

================
Comment at: llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/SIMemoryLegalizer.cpp:524
+         SIAtomicAddrSpace::NONE)
+      return enableSC0Bit(MI) | enableSC1Bit(MI);
+    return false;
----------------
Pierre-vh wrote:
> kzhuravl wrote:
> > jmmartinez wrote:
> > > NIT: Is the use of the bitwise or " | " intended? I'd use the logical or 
> > > " || " instead.
> > It is intentional, we need both SC0 and SC1 bits set. If I switch this to 
> > || it will short circuit and not invoke enableSC1Bit.
> IMHO then it needs a comment to explain that it's intentional, otherwise some 
> innocent maintainer in the future could think it's a typo and change it
Added comment.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D149986/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D149986

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
  • [PATCH] D149... Matt Arsenault via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH]... Konstantin Zhuravlyov via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH]... Juan Manuel Martinez CaamaƱo via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH]... Konstantin Zhuravlyov via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH]... Pierre van Houtryve via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH]... Konstantin Zhuravlyov via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH]... Konstantin Zhuravlyov via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH]... Scott Linder via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH]... Matt Arsenault via Phabricator via cfe-commits

Reply via email to