aaron.ballman added a comment. In D149677#4320178 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D149677#4320178>, @li.zhe.hua wrote:
> In D149677#4319646 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D149677#4319646>, @aaron.ballman > wrote: > >> Will this new printing policy be used in tree? > > Not initially, no. (I'm understanding "in tree" as "in the LLVM project".) You understand correctly. :-) > Some additional context: I'm working on a refactoring tool to, in part, > deprecate an alias by replacing it with its definition. That functionality by > itself could be provided through something like a clang-tidy, so I say > "initially". We typically don't add new printing policies in tree without some need for them in the project itself (otherwise this becomes a maintenance problem), and I'm not certain I see a strong need for this to live in Clang. I think it might be best to wait until you're closer to having a clang-tidy check that would use this functionality before we continue with this patch. WDYT? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D149677/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D149677 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
