aaron.ballman added a comment. In D150875#4353658 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D150875#4353658>, @erichkeane wrote:
> Ok, so I was curious why this was an extension. This is the original patch: > https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/80877c228d019e9cdca6295f3197867cc86e1720 > where @rsmith mentions there is no good reason for this limitation, then > mentions a core issue having been filed. I found CWG1923 > (https://open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/cwg_closed.html#1923), which is > said issue. The resolution is "Needs an EWG Paper", which seems to be the > end of the line, as I see no such paper? Because the Core issue ended up in extension territory and no extension paper came out, and because we don't know there's evidence of a significant user community, I think it's reasonable to remove this extension (it doesn't match our usual requirements for adding extensions). However, if @rsmith is planning to write such a paper (or if there is a paper and we just haven't spotted it), then that's a different story. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D150875/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D150875 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
