dim added a subscriber: bsdjhb. dim added a comment. In D150226#4353911 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D150226#4353911>, @aaron.ballman wrote:
> One of the major selling points to `constexpr` functions in C++ is that they > cannot contain UB -- if your code compiles, it is correct. This bug that > we've fixed was another instance of us accidentally allowing UB in a constant > expression context when we shouldn't have. FWIW, I pointed out a reasonable > workaround for the freebsd issue: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150226#4342516 I tried making that work for gdb, but I failed; there are some complains about deleted operator~ that I didn't see before, and I'm going to have to let it rest for a bit. I could maybe convince @bsdjhb to submit a solution, since he's contributed to gdb and binutils before. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D150226/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D150226 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
