aaron.ballman added a comment.

In D148505#4356951 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D148505#4356951>, @erichkeane 
wrote:

> I'm still on the fence.  I think properly documenting all of this entire 
> attribute would make me more comfortable here, particularly since it will 
> allow GCC to follow us easily some day.  I think that would move the needle 
> for me.

I think I've got a slightly different idea there: let's add a new documentation 
section for all of the related attributes in this area and document (or update) 
all of them in a block. This way, users have a good way to answer "which one do 
I use in what circumstance?" as well as other compiler devs who want to match 
our behavior. I think if we can make the documentation sufficiently clear, then 
this is fine.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D148505/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D148505

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to