aaron.ballman added a comment. In D148505#4356951 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D148505#4356951>, @erichkeane wrote:
> I'm still on the fence. I think properly documenting all of this entire > attribute would make me more comfortable here, particularly since it will > allow GCC to follow us easily some day. I think that would move the needle > for me. I think I've got a slightly different idea there: let's add a new documentation section for all of the related attributes in this area and document (or update) all of them in a block. This way, users have a good way to answer "which one do I use in what circumstance?" as well as other compiler devs who want to match our behavior. I think if we can make the documentation sufficiently clear, then this is fine. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D148505/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D148505 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits