michaelmaitland added inline comments.
================ Comment at: llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVScheduleV.td:41 +// Helper function to get the largest LMUL from MxList +// Precondition: MxList is sorted in ascending LMUL order. ---------------- michaelmaitland wrote: > pcwang-thead wrote: > > So, are we going to discard `LMULXXXImpl` below? > I will use `LMULXXXImpl` in a follow up NFC patch. This code below comes from > before `LMULXXXImpl` was introduced. Can you please provide an example of how you intend on this being used today? I think it depends on https://reviews.llvm.org/D146198 since if we use `LMULXXXImpl` today, there is no way to differentiate behavior based on LMUL. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D149495/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D149495 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
