hokein added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clangd/unittests/ClangdTests.cpp:1343 #undef CMDMACRO $inactive3[[#ifdef CMDMACRO int inactiveInt2; ---------------- While this patch is an improvement, I wonder we should move it further. Has been thinking about it more, we seem to have some inconsistent behavior on highlighting the `#if`, `#else`, `#endif` lines: - in `$inactive1` case, the `#endif` is marked as inactive (IMO, the highlighting in the editor is confusing, it looks like we're missing a match `endif`, thus I prefer to mark it as active to correspond to the active `#if` branch); - in `$inactive3` case, the line `#elif PREAMBLEMACRO > 0` is marked as inactive, this is inconsistent with `$inactive1` case; I think it would be nice to have a consistent model. One approach is to always consider `#if`, `#elif`, `#endif`, `#endif` lines active (in the implementation side, this would mean we always use the line range [skipp_range.start.line+1, skipp_range.end.line - 1]). What do you think about this? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D151190/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D151190 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
