galenelias marked an inline comment as done.
galenelias added a comment.

In D151761#4394758 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D151761#4394758>, @MyDeveloperDay 
wrote:

> did you consider a case where the case falls through? (i.e. no return)
>
>   "case log::info :    return \"info\";\n"
>   "case log::warning :\n"
>   "default :           return \"default\";\n"

That's a great point.  I didn't really consider this, and currently this 
particular case won't align the case statements if they have an empty case 
block, however if you had some tokens (e.g. `// fallthrough`) it would.  It's 
not immediately clear to me what the expectation would be.  I guess to align as 
if there was an invisible trailing token, but it's a bit awkward if the cases 
missing a body are the 'long' cases that push out the alignment.  Also, I don't 
think it's possible to use `AlignTokens` and get this behavior, as there is no 
token on those lines to align, so it's not straightforward to handle.  I guess 
I'll be curious to see if there is feedback or cases where this behavior is 
desired, and if so, I can look into adding that functionality later.  Since 
right now it would involve a completely custom AlignTokens clone, my preference 
would be to just leave this as not supported.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D151761/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D151761

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to