paulkirth added a comment.

The point of this patch was to show a regression. I'm not trying to fix 
anything per se. I'd like https://reviews.llvm.org/D151954  and anything that 
depends on it reverted, since it breaks `clang-format`. My understanding was 
that @owenpan was reluctant to revert since they couldn't reproduce the issue, 
but now that they can, I don't see why this can't go in (with a modified 
summary) after the revert (or as part of it).

I can of course revert those patches here, but it didn't make sense to me to do 
that, since it wouldn't show the regression.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D152473/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D152473

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to