jhuber6 added a comment. In D153909#4454383 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D153909#4454383>, @JonChesterfield wrote:
> I thought lld did the right thing if you pass it raw IR, without specifying > an arch, but on reflection it might just be silently miscompiling things. The > test doesn't seem to involve a specific type of input file, does clang foo.ll > -o a.out pass a mcpu flag along? > > It's a bit weird that the architecture doesn't seem to be embedded in the IR > file (e.g. you have to pass it to llc) but that's out of scope here it markedly does not work without it. I don't think there's currently facilities to define a module-wide architecture, there's only function-level metadata. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D153909/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D153909 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
