FreddyYe marked an inline comment as done.
FreddyYe added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang/test/CodeGen/attr-cpuspecific.c:47
 // LINUX: %[[FEAT_INIT:.+]] = load i32, ptr getelementptr inbounds ({ i32, 
i32, i32, [1 x i32] }, ptr @__cpu_model, i32 0, i32 3, i32 0), align 4
-// LINUX: %[[FEAT_JOIN:.+]] = and i32 %[[FEAT_INIT]], 1023
-// LINUX: %[[FEAT_CHECK:.+]] = icmp eq i32 %[[FEAT_JOIN]], 1023
+// LINUX: %[[FEAT_JOIN:.+]] = and i32 %[[FEAT_INIT]], 525311
+// LINUX: %[[FEAT_CHECK:.+]] = icmp eq i32 %[[FEAT_JOIN]], 525311
----------------
RKSimon wrote:
> FreddyYe wrote:
> > RKSimon wrote:
> > > FreddyYe wrote:
> > > > This value change is because the feature list of ivybridge described in 
> > > > X86TargetParser.def before missed feature "pclmul".
> > > Pull out an ivybridge fix into its own patch?
> > Emmm. Seems like a good idea. How about I change these two CPU's old 
> > feature list only? Since the successors of them will also have this issue, 
> > but no tests influenced.
> Sure, a single patch with multiple cpus' fixups is fine
Done in https://reviews.llvm.org/D154209


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to